![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Dear software protection developers
Jun. 2nd, 2013 10:40 amYou know, you don't have to be this helpful :)
(To those who don't quite get it: software protection schemes depend on obfuscation, because the computer is ultimately under control of the end user. That is a corollary to "if the attacker has physical access, you've already lost". Thus, naming functions things like "decryptClass" (since this is a Java protection library) or "VerifyLicense" is... not exactly wise.)
(To those who don't quite get it: software protection schemes depend on obfuscation, because the computer is ultimately under control of the end user. That is a corollary to "if the attacker has physical access, you've already lost". Thus, naming functions things like "decryptClass" (since this is a Java protection library) or "VerifyLicense" is... not exactly wise.)
